3/12/11

PATENT REFORM 2011 - VIDEO BRIEFING - House Rep Dana Rohrabacher; Senator Diane Feinstein on Keeping the 200+ U.S. Patent System "First to Invent"

[Updated 9-3-11]

House Rep Dana Rohrabacher gives a Gripping Speech against Patent Reform




Senator Diane Feinstein to Congress on How Changing the 200+ U.S. Patent System from "First to Invent" to "First to File" Will Hurt the U.S.


In this amendment that Senator Diane Feinstein proposed to the Senate, she provides an excellent explanation about how changing the 200+ U.S. Patent System from "First to Invent" to "First to File" will hurt the U.S.



Ironically, she supports all the other issues in Senate Bill S.23 which will hurt independent inventors. Although she supported this amendment to keep our "First to Invent" patent system, sadly the amendment was voted down by the Senate, and even more sadly, then she voted in favor of S. 23 which included the damaging change to a "First to File" system! Senate Bill S. 23 was voted in with a huge margin of 95 "yes" votes to only 5 "no" votes. However, most bills never make it through both the Senate and House, so this should not be discouraging.

The inventors voice has made a difference in the past 40 to 50 or so years that attempts have been made to change our effective "First to Invent" patent system. And you can make a difference now. Be sure to contact your two Senators and House Rep. and let them know your view on this. See the INSTANT ACTION PLAN on how you can do this easily within a few minutes.

PATENT REFORM 2011 - VIDEO BRIEFING - Alec Schibanoff, American Innovators for Patent Reform; Randy Landreneau

[Updated 9-3-11]

NO on "America Invents Act" aka Patent Reform Act of 2011 S.23 and H.R. 1249

American Innovators for Patent Reform


In this position statement by Alec Schibanoff, Executive Director of American Innovators for Patent Reform, he gives an excellent and concise recap about how the Patent Reform Act of 2011 will hurt small businesses, innovators, and independent inventors in the United States by changing from "First to Invent" to "First to File". There are other issues in the bill which will hurt independent inventors which are highlighted in this Video Briefing. Take a few minutes to learn about this important issue (it's under 7 minutes) and how it can affect your inventing path.



Randy Landreneau

Randy provides a straightforward explanation of how the proposed patent reform will hurt inventors and America.




Labels:

PATENT REFORM 2011 - ACTION PLAN - What You Can Do To Maintain Inventors' Rights

[UPDATED 9-3-11]

Ask Your Senators to vote "NO" on H.R. 1249 known as the "AMERICA INVENTS ACT" formerly known as Patent Reform Act.

Note: A bill must be introduced into both the House and the Senate, then it must be approved by a majority of both the House and the Senate, before finally being signed into law by the President. (
For more details about how a bill becomes law, click here.) If either the House or Senate rejects a bill, the bill is dead.

The Senate passed bill S. 23 on March 9, 2011 by a huge margin of 95 "yes" vs. only 5 "no".
See how all Senators voted on this bill at this link.
( www.opencongress.org/vote/2011/s/35 ).

The House passed bill H.R. 1249 on June 23, 2011 by a margin of 304 "yes" vs. 117 "no".
See how all House members voted on this bill at this link.
( www.opencongress.org/vote/2011/h/491 ).

In our opinion, many inventors are not aware of the proposed patent changes, and the voice of the independent inventor has not been heard in Washington D.C. You can make a difference! The tipping point can be as few as 100 people contacting their senators to turn the tide!

URGENT ALERT 9-3-11

FLASH NOTICE: Even though S.23 and H.R. 1249 have been passed by each house, they haven't been reconciled nor voted into law yet. There's a very short window of time between now and Sept 6 for you to contact your representatives if you would like to protest the patent reform.

1. Ask your SENATORS to vote "NO" on the Motion for Couture for H.R. 1249 on Tuesday. Couture would stop all further debate on the bills and schedule it for a final vote.
Ask them to keep the debate OPEN.
Click here to quickly find your two state Senators.

2. Ask all your Senators and Representatives to vote "NO" on H.R. 1249 changing our patent system to the foreign first-to-file.

Click here to quickly find your Representative.

Making a phone call is best. Sending a fax is next. Sending an email last. These are the absolute quickest ways to get the message across, but it needs to be done right now in order to make any difference. NOTE: Don't send anything by postal mail since it gets screened and can be delayed as much as weeks.

HAVE NO TIME TO WRITE A LETTER OR MAKE A CALL?
CLICK HERE TO SIGN A QUICK PETITION


Please distribute this to your friends, relatives, and business associates through social media like Twitter, Facebook, blogs, etc.


If your voices can succeed in at least postponing the bill, this will give everyone more time to look at the other issues that we believe will also stifle the development of intellectual property developed by independent inventors and small/medium-sized businesses in the U.S.


Index:
1. Sample Guide/Outline of How to Write a Message
2. Who to Contact

3. Chain Protest Viral Email Approach: The Power of Multiplication


1. SAMPLE GUIDE/OUTLINE OF HOW TO WRITE A MESSAGE:

Note: If possible, try to be original with your message so that they don’t all sound exactly the same. The following only gives you a general idea of what to write. Please be polite, rational, respectful, and professional, and refrain from using profanities and/or negative, emotionally charged comments.

NOTE: YOUR MESSAGE DOESN'T NEED TO BE LONG, JUST BE CLEAR AND TO THE POINT. THE GUIDE BELOW COVERS THE BASICS.

IMPORTANT: You MUST include your name and address in your Congressional correspondence because emails or letters without a full U.S. street address will not be read.

(First, State who you are:)
Dear Honorable (name),
My name is (John or Jane Smith) and I'm an (entrepreneur, independent inventor, person with a new idea, small business owner, product developer, etc.). I've been inventing for (x) years, etc. (feel free to add more of your own personalized information here.)

(Next, State your position:)
I am writing to let you know that I just became aware of the proposed patent changes and I strongly oppose bill (enter here), known as the H.R. 1249 America Invents Act of 2011.

(Then, State your views and opinions:)
(sample only, please write your own) I understand that the meetings for these proposed patent changes have been dominated by large corporations, and lack appropriate representation by the small businesses, independent inventors, inventor organizations, and the independent inventor community at large.

I believe that if passed, the H.R. 1249 the America Invents Act of 2011 will affect my own ability, as well as other independent inventors, small businesses and innovators, to profit from their inventions and innovations in the future. I believe that making such major changes to the U.S. patent system will impact our economy in a negative way, by removing incentives to invest in innovation e.g., capitalizing on the development, creation and marketing of intellectual property.

(Last, State the conclusion:)
Any one of the issues in bill “(enter here)”, alone, would be a major change to the U.S. patent system that could negatively affect inventors from being granted a patent. Many of the proposed changes in the two bills are tied-in to the worldwide “first-to-file” system. This first-to-file “package of issues", will destroy the intrinsic incentives and original intention of the U.S. 200+ year old patent system, the“First-to-Invent” which favors the creator i.e. inventor.

The U.S. patent system, created by our founding fathers, has been in place for over 200 years and I believe it has been a major catalyst to making the U.S. one of the greatest countries in the world and a leader in the creation of technology and innovation. A strong patent system that supports incentives for independent inventors, that has a level playing field for corporations and entrepreneurs will encourage the spirit of achievement that made this country great.

Please vote "NO" on COUTURE for H.R. 1249 and "NO" on bill H.R. 1249 for the America Invents Act of 2011 and maintain the genius of our founding fathers to keep the 200+ year old "First-to-Invent" system in place.

Respectfully yours,
(your name)



SOURCE: GOVTRACK.US
Tips for Communicating with Congress
Here are some excellent tips, be sure to read them to make sure that your message makes a difference!

Here's a good information web site with "Frequently Asked Questions" about Contacting the Congress
www.contactingthecongress.org/about.html

Back to top
2. WHO TO CONTACT:

YOUR THREE (3) STATE REPRESENTATIVES:

Contact your (2) senators for your state.

U.S. Senate:
Find your state's senators by entering your state at:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
It'll bring up a quick form that you can fill out and email to them!

U.S. House:
Find your state's representatives by entering your state at:
http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml
It'll bring up a chart of the states, click your state, and it'll bring up the web sites for your House representatives. Then look for the email form to contact your representatives.



If this is all you have time for, then you're done! But if you have a few more minutes to contact up to a few more individuals, the impact will be much greater.


SENATE MAJORITY LEADER WHO CALLED FOR THE COUTURE VOTE

Senator Reid is calling for the Senators to vote on the Motion for "Couture" which means there would be no further debate, amendments, comments, or opportunity to oppose the patent reform. That's why it's important for him to receive a copy of your letter.

THE HONORABLE HARRY REID (D-NV)
TITLE: Senate Majority Leader
Address: United States Senate
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3542
Fax: 202-224-7327
Email Form: http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm


CHAIRMEN OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE COMMITTEE WHO "INTRODUCED" THE BILLS



These next two contacts are the Chairmen of the House and Senate Committees who "introduced" the bills. It's important that everyone contact these individuals!

THE HONORABLE PATRICK LEAHY (D-VT)
Title: Chairman, U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate
Address: 437 Russell Senate Building
Washington DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4242
Email Form: http://leahy.senate.gov/contact/
Web site: leahy.senate.gov

THE HONORABLE LAMAR SMITH (R-TX21)
Title: Chair, House Committee on the Judiciary: Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property
Address: 2409 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-4236
Fax: (202) 225-8628
Web site: http://lamarsmith.house.gov/
Email: https://lamarsmith.house.gov/Contact/default.aspx

ALSO CONTACT THE FOLLOWING (2) KEY INFLUENTIAL DIGNITARIES IN WASHINGTON D.C.

The U.S. Patent Office is run by the U.S. Department of Commerce. So contacting the U.S. Secretary of Commerce as well as contacting the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office will help alert the top two U.S. officials related to the patent office, that independent inventors do not agree with the proposed patent changes.

THE HONORABLE GARY LOCKE
Title: U.S. Secretary of Commerce
U.S. Department of Commerce
1401 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20230
Phone: (202) 482-2000
Email: %%%TheSec@doc.gov
(Note: remove the three percentage characters [%%%] from the email address, they were added to prevent spam.)

THE HONORABLE DAVID KAPPOS
Title: Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
600 Dulany St,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
571-272-8600
571-273-0464 FAX
Email: %%%jennifer.rankin_byrne@uspto.gov (Send Attn: David Kappos c/o Jennifer Rankin, Press Relations)
(Note: remove the three percentage characters [%%%] from the email address, they were added to prevent spam.)

Back to top

3. CHAIN PROTEST EMAIL BLITZ: THE POWER OF MULTIPLICATION

PLEASE TWITTER THIS, RE-TWITTER THIS, FACEBOOK THIS, BLOG THIS.....

I believe that many inventors haven’t been aware about the proposed patent changes, and thus the voice of the independent inventor hasn’t been heard in Washington D.C. So the “Tipping Point” doesn’t require that many individuals, probably as few as 50 to 100 can make the difference and change the direction to defeat any bills. Certainly if thousands, or more, inventors contact our representatives, the independent inventor will surely be acknowledged.

So be sure to email other individuals that you know, who should also let their voice be heard on these important issues. Become an "email-activist" by emailing as many people as you can and asking them to also send an instant email. If, for example, you send out 10, your 10 emails can quickly multiply to 100, then 1000, 10,000, 100,000 and so on. This is a positive way to use the chain letter/networking concept for a good cause, and was the successful approach used by our founding fathers (well with letters, not emails!).

If you can also find time to call the office of your senators and representatives, in addition to the emails, it will add much more impact to your effort.

REMEMBER...
1) Contacting your two Senators and your local House Representative is the most important right now.
2) Also sending this out to friends, family and small businesses owners, small business networks etc. , be creative.

Back to top

4. KEEP INFORMED:

To receive updates, please check back regularly in to the Inventors' Voice blog at inventorsvoice.blogspot.com.

INVENTORS' VOICE TM. 8306 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 391 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 / 800 458-5624 / inventorsvoice@inventionconvention.com / inventorsvoice.blogspot.com

Copyright 2011. Stephen Paul Gnass. All Rights Reserved.

Labels:

PATENT REFORM 2011 - Bill S. 23 and HR.1249 Specific Information "America Invents Act"

Note: The final version of Senate Bill number S.23 has newly been titled the "America Invents Act" from the previous name "Patent Reform Act of 2011". Unfortunately it was passed by the Senate on March 8, 2011 by a margin of 95 "yes" vs. only 5 "no".

House Bill number H.R. 1249 was passed on June 23, 2011 by a margin of 304 "yes" vs. 117 "no".

THOMAS, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

THOMAS was launched in January of 1995, at the inception of the 104th Congress. The leadership of the 104th Congress directed the Library of Congress to make federal legislative information freely available to the public. You can check bills, resolutions, activity in Congress, the Congressional Record, schedules, calendars, committee information, etc.
GOVTRACK.US
GovTrack.US is a private site that tracks the U.S. government, drawing its information from the THOMAS web site. The layouts are easier to view and understand, though the information may be delayed a little. It's an excellent web site.

OVERVIEW OF BILLS
SUMMARY OF ISSUES IN BILLS
HOW CONGRESSMEN VOTED


MAPLight.org

MAPLight.org, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization, provides citizens and journalists the transparency tools to shine a light on the influence of money on politics. Elected officials collect large sums of money to run their campaigns, and they often pay back campaign contributors with special access and favorable laws. This common practice is contrary to the public interest, yet legal. MAPLight.org makes money/vote connections transparent, to help citizens hold their legislators accountable. MAPLight.org is nonprofit and nonpartisan.

CONNECTIONS

READ AND REVIEW THE ENTIRE BILLS IN PDF

BILL S. 23

BILL H.R. 1249


THE ADMINISTRATION'S POSITION ON S.23


THE U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE POSITION ON S.23


U.S. PATENT LAWS



(PDF format files can be viewed with Adobe Reader.)

Download Adobe Reader for Free Here

Labels:

3/11/11

PATENT REFORM 2011 - IN THE NEWS

PRESS COVERAGE

[UPDATED 9-5-11]


INTRODUCTION:
“Any one of the proposed issues, alone, would be a major change to the U.S. patent system. Currently, arguments by those supporting or opposing the current changes, seem to be focusing on a few issues related to infringement, calculating damages for infringement, and injunctive relief, which are critically important. But many of the proposed changes in the Patent Reform Act of 2011, now called the "America Invents Act of 2011" are tied-in to the worldwide “first-to-file” system. This first-to-file “package of issues” , along with the infringement issues, will destroy the intrinsic incentives and original intention of the U.S. 200+ year old patent system. A change to “first-to-file” will be detrimental to the independent inventor, our economy and our standard of living."
--Stephen Paul Gnass


Note: Articles are listed in descending chronological order, with the most recent first.


A Labor Day Message for President Obama
By Henry R. Nothhaft, Wall Street Journal
September 3, 2011
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904716604576542820083918028.html

How the new bid to reform patent law will kill jobs
By Gary Lauder, CNN Money
September 2, 2011
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2011/09/02/how-the-new-bid-to-reform-patent-law-will-kill-jobs/

Column: Unique U.S. patent system in peril
By Gary Lauder, USA Today
September 2, 2011
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2011-09-01/Column-Unique-US-patent-system-in-peril/50231894/1

Businesses Split on Merits of Overhauling Patent Process

By Adam Sege - McClatchy Newspapers

8/16/11

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/08/16/120932/businesses-split-on-merits-of.html


The Spoilsmen: How Congress Corrupted Patent Reform

By Zach Carter HuffPost Politics
8/4/11 Updated 8/15/11
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/04/patent-reform-congress_n_906278.html

Reid: Patent Reform Bill On Agenda After Recess
By Gautham Nages - The Hill's Hillicon Valley
8/2/11
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/175099-patent-reform-bill-on-senate-agenda-after-reces

How Will Patent Reform Solve The USPTO Backlog?
By Courtenay Brinckerhoff, PharmaPatents Blog
7/5/11
http://www.pharmapatentsblog.com/patent-reform/how-will-patent-reform-solve-the-uspto-examination-backlog/

Patently Absurd or: How to Go From the World's Best Patent System to Worse-Than-Most in a Single Step
By Gary Lauder, HuffPost Business
3/7/11
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-lauder/patently-absurd-or-how-to_b_832703.html

March 9, 2011 National Journal
By Josh Smith

House to Introduce 'Similar' Patent Reform Bill This Month

The House of Representatives will introduce its own version of patent reform legislation sometime this month, said House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas.


March 9, 2011 National Journal
By Josh Smith

Patent Bill Passes Senate, House Hurdles Lie Ahead

...The bill gathered wide, bipartisan support in the Senate, but the path ahead remains unclear. Several powerful business groups, as well some conservative activists, are opposed to some of the measure's provisions...



March 3, 2011 National Journal
By Josh Smith

Patent Debate Produces Odd, Bipartisan Alliances

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., introduced a promised amendment with the support of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., that would preserve the current U.S. system of issuing patents to whoever invents an item first. Under Leahy's proposed America Invents Act, patents would be awarded to the first person to file a patent application, even if someone else invented the item first.



February 28, 2011 The Huffington Post
Small Business America - By Jim Abrams

Patent Law Could Get Huge Overhaul Under New Bill

The patent system hasn't changed much since 1952 when Sony was coming out with its first pocket-size transistor radio, and bar codes and Mr. Potato Head were among the inventions patented. Now, after years of trying, Congress may be about to do something about that.



February 28, 2011 Yahoo News
By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press

Congress takes up major change in patent law


The Senate is taking up the Patent Reform Act, which would significantly overhaul a 1952 law and, supporters say, bring the patent system in line with 21st century technology of biogenetics and artificial intelligence.


Labels: